<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<XML><RECORDS>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>J. A. Konstan</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>B.R.S. Rosser</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>M.W. Ross</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>J. Stanton</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>W.M. Edwards</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2005</YEAR>
	<TITLE>The Story of Subject Naught: A Cautionary but Optimistic Tale of Internet Survey Research</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>10</VOLUME>
	<NUMBER>2</NUMBER>
	<ABSTRACT>&lt;p&gt;In a web-based, sexual behavior risk study using a rigorous response validation protocol, we identified 124 invalid responses out of 1,150 total (11% rejection). Nearly all of these (119) were due to repeat survey submissions from the same participants, and 65 of them came from a single participant. This brief describes how we were able to detect these repeat submissions using the validation protocol, and highlights the importance of using both automated and manual validation techniques&lt;/p&gt;</ABSTRACT>
	<URL>http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/konstan.html</URL>
</RECORD>
</RECORDS></XML>